You, thou and thee

A statistical analysis of Shakespeare's use of pronominal address terms

Authors

  • Isolde van Dorst Lancaster University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.59.1.02

Keywords:

Shakespeare, corpus linguistics, digital humanities, statistical modelling, pronominal address terms

Abstract

This study creates a prediction model to identify which linguistic and extra-linguistic features influence pronoun choices in the plays of Shakespeare. In the English of Shakespeare’s time, the now-archaic distinction between you and thou persisted, and is usually reported as being determined by relative social status and personal closeness of speaker and addressee. But it remains to be determined whether statistical machine learning will support this traditional explanation. 23 features are investigated, having been selected from multiple linguistic areas, such as pragmatics, sociolinguistics and conversation analysis. The three algorithms used, Naive Bayes, decision tree and support vector machine, are selected as illustrative of a range of possible models in light of their contrasting assumptions and learning biases. Two predictions are performed, firstly on a binary (you/thou) distinction and then on a trinary (you/thou/thee) distinction. Of the three algorithms, the support vector machine models score best. The features identified as the best predictors of pronoun choice are the words in the direct linguistic context. Several other features are also shown to influence the pronoun prediction, including the names of the speaker and addressee, the status differential, and positive and negative sentiment.

References

Bate, Jonathan, and Eric Rasmussen, eds. 2007. William Shakespeare: Complete works. London: The Royal Shakespeare Company.

Brown, Roger W., and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity.” In Style in language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253-76. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Busse, Beatrix. 2006. Vocative constructions in the language of Shakespeare. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Busse, Ulrich. 2003. “The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address forms in the Shakespeare Corpus: Who says thou or you to whom?”, in Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 193-221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Busse, Ulrich. 2002. The function of linguistic variation in the Shakespeare corpus: A corpus-based study of the morpho-syntactic variability of the address pronouns and their socio-historical and pragmatic implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Calvo, Clara. 1992. “Pronouns of address and social negotiation in As You Like It.” In Language and Literature, Vol. 1(1), 5-27. London: Longman Group UK Ltd.

Greenblatt, Stephen, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katherine E. Maus. 1997. The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Mazeland, Harrie. 2003. Inleiding in de conversatieanalyse. Bussum: Coutinho bv.

Mazzon, Gabriella. 2003. “Pronouns and nominal address in Shakespearean English: A socio-affective marking system in transition.” In Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 223-49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Quennell, Peter, and Hamish Johnson. 2002. Who’s who in Shakespeare. London: Routledge.

Quirk, Randolph. 1974. “Shakespeare and the English language.” In The linguist and the English language, edited by R. Quirk, 46-64. London: Edward Arnold.

Stein, Dieter. 2003. “Pronomial usage in Shakespeare: Between sociolinguistics and conversation analysis.” In Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 251-307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker. 2003. “Introduction.” In Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 1-25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Thelwall, Mike, Kevan Buckley, Georgious Paltoglou, Di Cai, and Arvid Kappas. 2010. “Sentiment strength detection in short informal text.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2544-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21416.

Walker, Terry. 2003. “You and thou in Early Modern English dialogues: Patterns of usage.” In Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 309-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Published

2019-06-11